New York Cowboy.org
Home > Fodder > Freedom > Radicalism

Radicalism rss

What does it mean to be a radical?

August 31, 2002

Changing Parties: It's not always a bad thing when officials change parties.

Clean Coal: Those who oppose replacing old plants are just blocking environmental progress.

Confidentiality: My safe guards against revealing political secrets on NYC.

Conservatism: A look at real conservatives.

Democrats and Taxes: Overcoming the weakness Democrats have on the issue of taxation

District Attorneys as Agents of Political Change: District Attorneys have an important role beyond just enforcing the law.

Global Warming: Global warming is a real problem needing real solutions.

How a Liberal Can Win in a Conservative Countryside: Some thoughts on new libertarian Democrat.

Liberal Cowboy: Why one liberal is proud to wear his cowboy hat.

Liberalism v. Conservatism: Neither ideology is desirable in it's pure form.

Libertarianism: A pratical look at libertarianism.

Non-Partisan as Liberal: Many organizations claim to be without partisan affiliation, but are they really?

Progressives: An Uneasy Relationship: Progressives need to do more to change insitutions and not individuals.

Ron Paul's Revolution: His libertarian ideas deserve consideration, as does the commitment of his supporters.

Self-Enrichment in Government: Just because people benefit from a policy doesn't mean they're corrupt.

Shovel the Cow Dung: Sometimes you just have to get a little dung on your shoes to be succesful.

What is a Watt?: People don't often under the cost of energy.

Why Ideology Based Parties are Bad for America: A short essay discussing the pitfalls of ideology and politics.

Radicalism

So you say your some kind of radical. And my question, is what kind of good are you? Being a radical, can you do anything really worthwhile for society? Or is ideology the be all, get all, for you?

If you look at all the revolutionaries in America's history, few were ever successful. Maybe they helped advance their cause in the short run, but they left little to be worked on after that single cause. They were quickly marginialized, and found themselves with little to no role in improving society.

After all, what happened to Sam Adams, for example, after the revolution? Not much, that effected American society, at any rate.

If you can't come to the way America works in pragmatic terms, you've always lost the battle. The mentality that things can't be changed, is a self-fufilling prophecy, you'll never change things with that attitude.

America is a procedural republic, and as such, procedure is the key to debate. If you can legimitize your argument by procedure, then your argument will be noticed, and you will be successful. But if your a radical, and reject societies insitutions, you've already lost the battle. Fighting isn't worth the effort.

That said, many self-styled radicals have brought change on the table, but it has been mostly by pragmatic grounds. They've found themselves in elected office or lobbying with hard facts, that give them power they never before had.

[Picture]

Copyright ©1999-2008 Andy Arthur.
All mistakes are intentional or otherwise.
Mind where you step in a cow pasture or legal mindfield.