Freedom is the ultimate question of society: how to protect it and how to maximize it. It is a question of 'irrationality' and privacy (the ability for the 'irrational' to exist without society attempting to eliminate it), both are essential to protecting what I call freedom.

I don't really care about political or economic freedoms, these items are mostly procedural freedoms for the economic and political elite, not freedoms that we experience on an everyday bases.

Real freedoms are what you can do and what you can't do. Responsible freedom dictates what one can do without greatly harming others substantial rights to freedom. The state has the responsibility to allow you to do as much as any one autonomous individual would want to do in their live times.

This means that the late capitalist state should:

• Allow all people to seek the education they want
• Allow all people to seek the careers that they desire
• Allow all people to work in where they are allowed to make reasonable choices that are not unconscionable
• Allows them to live where they desire
• Provides them a wide variety of activities to engage in during their free time
• Provide moral guidance (but allow reasonable choice of morals)
• And most importantly allows them to live with reasonable security

I'm not arguing that this is an extremely controversial doctrine. In particular it means a curtailing of ideologies that believe in the ends over the means for solutions to environmental and safety issues. While we should think about tomorrow, and make plans to establish our reasonable security for tomorrow, we should do so with minimal undermining of our freedom today.

This definition fails to accurately and precisely define freedom. I have worked on defining what it means to be free, without much results. Absolute truths can never be defined, as their absoluteness is beyond words and thoughts.