A Republican Congressman from Texas whose running as a libertarian in a crowded Republican field has gotten a lot of attention this year, both for his beliefs, his ability to fund raise, and the ability to get the grassroots out and supporting him.

He's an solidly ideological candidate, that offers his supporters a strong view of the future—a system of limited government, where much of the services we receive are privatized. He's anti-war, anti-tax, and anti-government. He and his followers claim that he's vision for the world is more conservative then that of his Republican opponents.

Ron Paul's strength is also his greatest weakness. These views are popular to disillusioned citizens who believe that they are over-taxed and that government is making too many choices for them. Yet, traditionally those citizens don't vote and have little voice in the process. Libertarian philosophy doesn't encourage active participation in affairs—it's hands off ideology.

A lot of Republicans care about more then keeping government spending low and regulation weak. Many Republicans want government to take a moral stance on the issues of the day, and push for strong national defense and action against violent criminals on our streets.

Indeed, if you review Ron Paul's voting record it has clearly been a conservative one besides being an libertarian. He's not just against government, he's against it in conservative ways. He may not be a pro-military as some Republicans nor as strong against-abortion, but nobody's going to confuse him for being a liberal.

Ron Paul's ideas deserve discussion in our political system. With his massive campaign finances he has amassed, along with his likely strong showing in the Iowa caucus tomorrow, his candidacy is one we should be watching carefully to see what it means for the mood of our country.